I strongly condemn harbhajan singh's behavior, he should not be allowed to play cricket anymore.Am i correct.

Question

For his behavior in Australia, and towards Shrishant.

Answer 1

Yes, u r right...Bhajji's behaviour was intolerable but he already got the deserved punishment (ban from IPL was enough & he lost 3 crores too)...Banning him from the national team would be too harsh!

Answer 2

no,he should not be punished more. punishment is already given to him.I think shreesanth should also be punished as he might have provoked him.bhajji is a good bowler and he plays important role in getting victory.we should not forget his contributions.

Answer 3

Bhajji and Sreesanth both should not be allowed to play cricket anymore.

Answer 4

no you are incorrect ,he should just be banned for 10 more international matches

Answer 5

It is not shreesanth's mistake he is only very happy & in excitement & harbhajan  thought that he is teasing him.

So that's y he beat him.

so they dont have to punish shreesanth.

If u like  my ans then be my fan.

ok.

Answer 6

Sreesanth shud also have been punished. Harbajan had learnt it  the hard way. Hope, its a lesson for others too..

Answer 7

This is little harsh.We should punish  both of them equally.Bcs both of them would have committed  mistake on there behalf

Answer 8

I don't think you will get any arguments about that. But tell me, where were all of you when he misbehaved in Australia? You all blamed the Aussies! Well now you know we were telling the truth about him.

Answer 9

Yes you are correct, looking at His behavior he really shouldn't be allowed to play any more. but you can't ignore the talent that he has got, after all he is a really good bowler and a handy batsman at some stages. He should be given another chance, but he also should be on very tight leash, where he can not any more mistakes.

same thing needs be applied to Sreesanth, he too have some attitude problems with other players.

Answer 10

Before he was gagged by the BCCI the invistigator stated that Harbhajan's actions looked "pre-meditated"! If this is the case he definately deserves a much longer ban, which he still might recieve from the BCCI.

Why is the BCCI protecting Harbhajan? http://www.sportsatisfaction.com/forum/s...

Answer 11

Who cares ? Its there life .

Bhajji was provoked.

Answer 12

he is behaving in a bad way but i hope he has learnt his lesson cause he is a good bowler n is needed for both mumbai indians n team india

Answer 13

Bingalee mate i totally agree with u 100% why didn't the indian media bring up anything about harbhajan's behaviour when he was down here aye?? instead they blame the auzzie crowds and the auzzie players mate i meann harbhajan got what was comming to him he deserved it that the fact of the crowd booing at him but what did roy do when he went 2 india?? what just because he helped the auzzie's win games down there y do they have 2 call him a monkey?? do u know wat the stupid indian cricket boards excuse was when the crowd was making monkey actions when symonds was on the field?? the stupid board goes in there stupid indian accents "OH THE CROWD WAS PRAYING TO THE MONKEY GOD NOT CALLING SYMONDS A MONKEY" far out stupidd dumbshitts honestly the acb told the crowd not 2 be racial to the indians when they came here ponting told the crowd not 2 be racial when the indians came here but what did the indian cricket board do?? they wanted the crowd being racial to symonds so did the indian team itself andd also harbhajan should be placed in a boxing ring with andrew symonds one on one and i guarantee after symonds smashes harbhajan they won't have any more problems and harbhajan should not be allowed to play because he is a disgrace to cricket

Answer 14

yeah i agree

Answer 15

I think the ban is sufficient as punishment.